Git pull remote branch and rebase update#
Git pull remote branch and rebase trial#

Now if you did a 'normal' pull you would get A - B - C - X - Y <-(origin/master)īut if you use git pull -rebase then the pull will rebase the local master onto the newly-fetched origin/master instead, so you get A - B - C - X - Y <-(origin/master) You instead had A - B - C <-(origin/master)īecause you did your work directly on master. Let's say instead of A - B - C <-(master)(origin/master) To run this command on the develop branch: git config true.

So the correct syntax is: git config branch..rebase true. git pull remote branch and rebase

Flimm, I needed to add true to make your first option work. What -rebase lets you do is not create the branch in the first place but still end with a linear history (if you're into that sort of thing). This makes the -rebase option the default when issuing a git pull on a given branch. Perform rebasing using the git push rebase origin command 3.

Git pull remote branch and rebase update#

When pulling master, -rebase changes what the pull does with commits in master but not in origin/master - and in your scenario there are none. Run git pull origin to update local branch with changes from remote branch 2. You could do a -rebase pull, and it would work exactly the same, because you're not in the situation where -rebase is meaningful. Then when you pull, the resulting merge is a fast-forward, and you can then rebase your branch onto master to keep a linear history (if you're into that sort of thing). In your current procedure, you leave master at origin/master (because you're working on a branch). Question: Can/Should I change the above steps to: git clone **git push -set-upstream origin feature/my-branch** In the steps above I have rebased onto the HEAD of master, whereas most git pull -rebase explanations appear to focus on rebasing upon commits made to the same branch (not the original master). If everything runs without conflict you're good to go. and then rebase it with the master: git rebase master. Then go back to you branch: git checkout mybranch.

It will run a git fetch with merge behind the scenes on your git master branch. My question is (assuming that is correct) how does the git pull -rebase know which branch I am rebasing on? then update it with the remote changes: git pull. At this point you should not rebase your work. My understand of git pull -rebase is that it does as I've described above. You create a pull request, others are reviewing your work and are potentially fetching it into their fork for local review. My understanding is that - at this point - all the commits I've made while working on my branch will be applied 'after' those master commits. But when git rebase fails, you are left in this 'detached HEAD' mode. What I would then do, locally, is git checkout master, git pull, then checkout my branch and git rebase master git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head GIT REBASE. Will pull master branch into your local repository. Basically you are pulling remote branch to your local, example: git pull origin master. Other commits have, during my branch work, been PR'd into master. git-pull - Fetch from and integrate with another repository or a local branch GIT PULL. Editing the history of feature branches and personal forks is fine, and editing commits that you havent pushed yet is always okay. If there is a remote-tracking branch corresponding to the upstream branch and the upstream branch was rebased since last fetched, the rebase uses that information to avoid rebasing non-local changes.Starting point: I have created a branch from master and locally made commits. When true, rebase the current branch on top of the upstream branch after fetching. Advantage of this approach is that changed upstream commits don't result in conflicts with the old version of these commits. git rebase -onto / a, with a the most recent upstream commit that is a parent of your local current branch). due to a rebase or amend of already pushed commits), git pull -rebase is git fetch + a rebase of the local changes on the remote branch (i.e. Therefore, the rebase needs to be interactive so these commits can be skipped: git pull -rebaseinteractive or as of Git 2.

Git pull remote branch and rebase trial#

Trial to better explain the difference between git pull -rebase and git rebase incorporating the comments of and situation: If the history of the upstream wasn't rewritten, git pull -rebase is git fetch + git rebase.Īdvanced situation: If the history of the upstream was rewritten (f.ex. This is an option with the pull command: git pull -rebase In your particular case, commits have been removed which you don't want to be reapplied.